Nickeled & Dimed

Penny for your thoughts?

We are accepting articles on our new email:

, ,

Reimagining India’s Role in the Thirty Meter Telescope Project

Source: Ke Kalahea
                                      Source: Ke Kalahea

Kalyani Unkule talks about India’s participation in the controversial TMT Project in Hawaii which is facing protests on cultural and environmental grounds and proposes a rethink in light of India’s own rich culture of supporting heritage over moneyed development.

Scientific research is becoming increasingly internationally collaborative in nature and several of the Government of India’s policy initiatives have sought to grasp resulting opportunities. According to the Department of Science and Technology’s Annual Report 2014-15, “DST is able to strategically leverage ‘international collaborative advantage’ by building chosen international alliances and partnerships with selected countries that can have perceptible yields”. The Thirty Meter Telescope or TMT project in Hawaii is a prime recent example of such a collaboration with players such as American and Canadian Universities, the governments of China and Japan, Private funders, and the Department of Science and Technology in India.

The key scientific objectives of the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) project would be to study the origins of galaxies distant in space and time, to better understand formation of stars and planets and to investigate the existence of extra terrestrial life forms. The contribution committed by the Government of India stands approximately at INR 1300 crores with a cash component of 30 per cent. The in-kind contribution is envisaged in the form of sensors, software, components and facilities. This satisfies two major items in the overall vision articulated by the Department of Science and Technology, namely, to “accelerate institutional and human capacity building through international exposure and linkages” and “connect Indian research with global efforts in frontier areas and in addressing global challenges”.

The Maunakea mountain on one of the Hawaiian islands was chosen as the site for setting up the telescope for being uniquely situated in terms of the clarity it affords for optimal functioning of the telescope. It is hard to say whether anyone anticipated at the time that Maunakea and TMT would emerge as a landmark, a polarizing chapter in the longstanding tussle over advancement of science on the one hand and the protection of cultural rights and environmental conservation on the other.

Hawaiian folklore extols this volcanic mountain as the firstborn (of the earth mother Papa and the sky father Wakea) and its peak is widely regarded as the navel of the islands in popular imagination. Hence, resistance to the TMT on cultural and legal grounds has drawn considerable support among the local community. In a letter to the Governor of the State of Hawaii, earlier this year, activists say: “In spite of our court appeals, culminating years of legal effort on our part, bulldozers and other heavy equipment now assemble on the mountaintop to begin construction of this massive, eighteen storey high facility—in shameful disrespect for Hawaii’s legal process, host culture and all law-abiding citizens of Hawaii. Is it any wonder that Hawaiians and community members, out of respect for the legal process and in defense of their oldest and deepest traditions—have gathered in protest on the mountain?” Desecration of burial sites has been a thorny issue in Hawaii and opponents have also alleged its occurrence in this case. While the scientific community has not painted a particularly alarming picture of potential harm the TMT project might cause to Hawaii’s many endangered species of flora and fauna, a rising tide of environmental consciousness among the wider public means that the TMT is viewed with suspicion regardless.

Such is the vigour of the protests that the Board of Land and Natural Resources recently voted to adopt emergency measures restricting public access to Maunakea hoping to limit confrontation. The NGO Environment Hawaii reports that one protestor present at the hearing before the board responded to this decision by simply saying: “I’ll see you on the mountain”.

There are other voices that question the authenticity of these cultural beliefs branding them instead as superstition and drawing attention to Hawaii’s more recent history of acquiescence to Western technology and integration with the American political system and way of life. In the words of one blogger: “Today, we have a new generation of Hawaiians who insist on resurrecting the old gods and superstitious beliefs that were used by the elites of Hawaiian society to oppress and subjugate the common people. I believe our ancestors welcomed change and an end to the superstitious beliefs.”

While both votaries and opponents of the TMT dig in their heels, there are questions that India must ask itself as party and potential beneficiary.  Is there room to balance environmental concerns and sociocultural rights of communities against scientific exploration in our imagination of policy? The short answer is that while this seems to clearly be necessary to secure longer term public welfare, a more conscious effort needs to be made to articulate it in policy formulation. Secondly, how much should we tangibly stand to gain through participation in a certain project to justify the costs imposed on communities – distant or closer home? Setting priorities is the advisable course of action both in terms of identifying the most desirable direction for different kinds of scientific breakthrough sought and the ancillary goals such as joint initiatives with other leading powers with the strategic implications thereof. Furthermore, does our obligation to future generations stop at augmenting reserves of knowledge through fresh discovery? A more balanced understanding of inter-generational justice would dictate that we are equally responsible for connecting them with our ancestors by preserving and transferring their wisdom.

As an aspiring global actor we are surely obligated to set standards and uniformly apply them whether at home or abroad. In the wake of protests, the TMT is gaining in visibility and profile across the world and this makes the reputation that India stands to gain or expend in this process a worthy consideration.  At home we often sacrifice pragmatism at the altar of something held sacred by a subsection of our pluralistic society. India is not (yet) the country that lets growth and development run roughshod over mnemonic symbols held dear. And in recent history, we have hardly ever let our own governments set something up in our backyards without raising a hue and cry. India’s aspiration to be at the cutting edge of technological and scientific advancement is perfectly legitimate. But when it comes to advocating that this be achieved whilst minimizing damage to environmental and cultural heritage and proposing approaches based on introspection and self-awareness, India’s should be the strongest voice in the room.

Kalyani Unkule is an Assistant Professor at the Jindal Global Law School and Assistant Dean, International Collaborations

4 responses to “Reimagining India’s Role in the Thirty Meter Telescope Project”

  1. It’s not about superstitions… the people of Hawaiian are getting tired of other people speaking and writing about why Hawaiians oppose the construction of the 14th super-sized telescope on their mountaintop.
    In all fairness, it would be better to interveiw any of the protectors/activists themselves. Or check out their Facebook page to discover what the opposition to building the largest 18 story telescople!
    In addition to 2 stories underground, 5 acres of dynamite and bulldozed mountain.

    There are already 13 huge telescopes on top of Mauna Kea; by law, the construction stopped at 13 telescope, and no more.

    But please do not mention superstitions, because it’s about rightful ownership of LAND.
    The public lands belong to the kanaka, the Hawaiians, the legal owners of the public lands.
    The military bases and mountains and public lands of Hawaii do not belong to the illegal occupier USA, nor to the Univ. of Hawaii, nor to the Americans.
    There is no Treaty of Annexation with the USA.
    Hawaiian Kingdom was taken by force when the navy illegally overthrew the Hawaiian government in 1893.
    USA had 4 treaties with Hawaiian Kingdom and broke all treaties.
    On July 6, 1846, U.S. Secretary of State John C. Calhoun, on behalf of President Tyler, afforded formal recogntion of Hawaiian independence. As a result of the recognition of Hawaiian independence the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into treaties with the major nations of the world and established over ninety embassies and consulates in multiple seaports and cities.

    Austria-Hungary in 1875
    Belgium in 1862
    Denmark in 1846
    France in 1857
    Germany in 1879
    Great Britain in 1851
    Italy in 1863
    Japan in 1871
    Luxembourg in 1862, William III, King of the Netherlands was also the Grand Duke of Luxembourg
    Netherlands in 1862
    Portugal in 1882
    Russia in 1869
    Samoa in 1887
    Spain in 1863
    Swiss Confederation in 1864
    Sweden and Norway in 1852
    United States in 1849, 1875, 1883, 1884
    Universal Postal Union in 1885

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The people of India should ask themselves, would they like the Hawaiians to come and build an 18 story observatory in their holy places – Himalayan Char Dham – Badrinath, Kedarnath, Gangotri, and Yamunotri. Varanasi/Kashi, Allahabad/Prayag, Haridwar-Rishikesh, Mathura-Vrindavan, and Ayodhya.

    Or build an 18 story observatory on top of The four Peethas of Puri, Rameswaram, Dwarka, and Badrinath?

    No difference. Now I’m hungry for a steak. Oh, that’s YOUR ancestor? Oh well, get over it, that’s just a superstition.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Anyone attempting to justify the u.s., its mercenary character openly and clearly cloaked with belligerence and arrogance appears the fool not able to take themselves seriously. The outlandishly false statement from their president Obama that “the world is better off because of the u.s. reveals a level of self centered egotism centered solidly upon a history revealing the opposite to be true. The u.s. is not a benevolent friend…it is a thief and occupier intent upon relieving the true host from residency while making life for the true occupant impossible. I am Kanaka Aupuni…a Hawaiian National who has served both my country and the u.s. privately and militarily. What seems honest and true to me today is that the u.s. and those who partner with the u.s. regarding any endeavor which even remotely results in a loss to the Kanaka Maoli to their Aina, their cultural integrity, their peace of mind and serenity is a war crime to be processed as such and paid for as such. Inspection of the facts and evidence past and present will reveal this testimony to be true. Inspection of the Mauna and the debris left upon it including tracking towers abandoned as un-useable and not removed restoring the sites to the original condition is further evidence of what a partner of the u.s. will be identified. Collaborators beware. Your future integrity is at stake. Malalma Pono.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Aloha Inia, That is our name for your Country, we at this time would want you to recognize our treaty with you. We like you as a example of gaining your Independence from one of the most Colonistic Country of that timing, we are also in the throes of our own Identity and Country patriotism, we do not identify with the Patriotism of America’s violent Independence from England, no bombs bursting in air, no car bombs, just a lot of Aloha from a Neutral and Friendly Nation we believe, if we win our Islands and Identity back through love and Aloha it can only be taken by love and Aloha, we take back by violence it will be taken back by greater violence. Our Independence won’t be at the expense of Hawaiian or American lives or like the expense of the native peoples of Great Turtle Island now named America. We believe in the Family of Nations, not the League, not the United but the precepts of Family of nations minus the mandatory christen part, like the Pope said we need a cultural revolution to save planet earth and a revolution to fix this perverse economy. The Papal Bulls have been rescinded. No excuses anymore.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: