By Anushka S
Abstract:
Forging a new path in service to the nation, the Agnipath Scheme stokes youthful ambition while kindling the fires of patriotism. Promising fresh energy within the ranks, this initiative balances dreams of duty with the reality of brief, four-year service. Yet, a question arises: will the scheme elevate the aspirations of the youth, or will it undermine the integrity of the army while rendering the recruits’ skills redundant?
Introduction:
An opportunity to represent your country, the chance to work with dedicated fellow patriots, and the honour of joining a courageous group that embodies and protects the pride of the nation—there’s no career more coveted than that offered by the Indian Armed Forces. The Agnipath Scheme, introduced in 2022, was designed to harness this patriotic sentiment and create more pathways for Indian youth to join the army, airforce, and navy. Those selected, known as ‘Agniveers,’ receive lump sum salaries of up to 4 lakhs in their first year, with increases as they progress. However, there’s a catch—the Agniveers can serve only for 4 years, and permanent retention after this period is limited to just 25% of recruits. This condition has made the policy both widely debated and highly scrutinized. This article seeks to analyse the policy, examine its feasibility, and whether it strengthens or dampens the youth’s desire for both meaningful employment and a chance to serve their nation.
Program Highlights:
The scheme was introduced by the Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh as an effort to create a youthful profile of the Armed forces. The Agnipath Scheme is open to young men aged between 17.5 and 21 years, offering them a unique opportunity to serve the nation while gaining valuable experience. ‘Agniveers,’ or recruits begin with an annual salary of ₹4.76 lakhs in the first year, which increases to ₹6.92 lakhs by the fourth year. Upon completing their four-year term, Agniveers can apply voluntarily for a regular position in the armed forces, with up to 25% selected from each batch based on merit and organizational needs. Throughout their service, Agniveers and the government jointly contribute to the Seva Nidhi Package, which results in a tax-free amount of ₹11.71 lakhs upon completion of their tenure. This financial support is further complemented by access to training at existing military institutes, enhancing their skills for both military and civilian life. The scheme also provides substantial support in cases of injury or death during service. In the event of supreme sacrifice, Agniveers are covered by non-contributory insurance worth ₹1 crore, in addition to full salary for the unserved portion of their tenure. If disabled during their term, Agniveers receive the Seva Nidhi Package with full interest, compensation of up to ₹44 lakhs based on the level of disability, and payment for the remaining period of service.
Injecting Youthful Vitality and Fiscal Efficiency into the Armed Forces:
One of the key impacts of the Agnipath Scheme is its potential to lower the average age within the armed forces. Military officials highlight that this system would decrease the Army’s average age from 32 to 26, injecting ‘young blood’ into the ranks and keeping the forces energetic, agile, and mission-ready. Beyond retention, the scheme’s approach to skill development addresses the future of the 75% of Agniveers who won’t secure permanent positions. The scheme emphasizes that these young men will re-enter society with advanced skills, military discipline, and specialized training. The government has committed to supporting Agniveers’ transition to careers within the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), Assam Rifles, and allied roles, aiming to absorb around 15-20% of former Agniveers. State governments have also announced specific reservations for these individuals. For example, the Haryana government offers a 10% reservation in roles such as constables, mining guards, forest guards, jail wardens, and special police officers. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has noted that Agniveers transitioning to paramilitary forces will not be required to undergo physical testing; instead, they need only provide a fitness certificate. In addition, age relaxations have been discussed to ease their transition. For Agniveers interested in entrepreneurial ventures, the government has also prioritized access to bank loans, helping them channel their acquired skills and experiences into new opportunities.
Other than the recruits, the scheme benefits the Ministry of Defence as well. The financial efficiency of the Agnipath Scheme offers a significant budgetary advantage, designed to help ease the Defence Ministry’s fiscal burden, particularly the expenses of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme. By hiring Agniveers on a short-term basis, the ministry reduces long-term pension obligations and generates substantial annual savings, estimated at over ₹1,000 crore if 60,000 Agniveers are inducted each year. These savings can be redirected towards military modernization, ensuring funds for advanced technology, infrastructure, and weaponry.
Challenges of Retention, Unity, and Public Perception:
While this policy seems attractive, it has certain discrepancies that need to be addressed. The scheme’s short-term nature and selective retention have sparked discussions on whether these elements align with the traditional values and stability that draw many to military service in the first place. One of the things contested is the retention percentage. Col Rajeev Agarwal (retd.) writes in India Today that “One quarter is extremely inadequate and needs to be reviewed. It also raises questions on the lengthy and laborious recruitment process: what is the point if after all the hard work, three-fourths of selected candidates are rejected?” The low retention rate of the Agnipath Scheme poses potential challenges to its overall appeal, particularly among young recruits who aspire to a stable, long-term military career. A major concern is that the limited opportunity for permanent placement could dampen recruits’ morale and commitment, as they may feel less invested in a career with few assurances of lasting service. This reduced commitment could, in turn, affect overall motivation and the likelihood of building the strong sense of loyalty that traditional service members develop over time. Operational challenges may also surface, as integrating Agniveers with regular jawans under varying service terms and benefits could hinder cohesive group dynamics within battalions, complicating the establishment of unified team loyalty and operational harmony. Furthermore, the public perception of Agniveers as short-term, ‘temporary’ soldiers could negatively impact the image of the armed forces, creating an impression that Agniveers are expendable. Such a perception risks diminishing the respect and honour traditionally associated with military service. This view might deter youth who are drawn to the idea of a lifelong career in service to the nation, affecting recruitment and potentially creating gaps in both experienced personnel and the morale of future candidates. The training period for Agniveers is just 31 weeks. This could create an imbalance in experience levels within units, potentially impacting operational efficiency. Units might lack experienced, long-term members due to the high turnover associated with Agniveers.
Another significant disadvantage of the Agnipath Scheme emerged following a tragic incident during training at the Artillery Centre in Nashik, Maharashtra, where two Agniveers lost their lives due to an artillery shell explosion on October 11, 2024. This incident brought to light a contentious aspect of the scheme: the disparity in compensation and benefits provided to Agniveers compared to regular soldiers. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi also highlighted this issue, demanding answers from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on why the families of Agniveers who died in service do not receive the same pension and benefits as those of other martyred soldiers. The program’s temporary nature means that Agniveers and their families may receive limited benefits and compensation if they are injured or killed in service compared to regular soldiers who receive a pension and comprehensive posthumous support. This disparity risks creating a perception of unequal treatment within the ranks, which could affect the morale of Agniveers and deter potential recruits who seek assurance of security for themselves and their families. The incident also raises broader questions about whether the scheme sufficiently safeguards the well-being and recognition of Agniveers, given the risks associated with military service.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Agnipath Scheme stands as a transformative juncture for the Indian Armed Forces, intertwining the ambitions of young Indians with the security needs of the nation. Although designed to kindle patriotic spirit and provide a pathway for youth to serve, the scheme’s short-term model raises valid concerns about its lasting sustainability. Presenting military service as a brief four-year role might risk diminishing the perception of the army as a lifelong commitment, potentially causing some to view it as a temporary or disposable career choice. Additionally, without defined avenues for employment or support for Agniveers, once they complete their service, the state risks investing in skill development only to leave these trained individuals without clear post-service prospects, which could render the initiative less impactful. The scheme has also drawn criticism for fostering disparities within the armed forces, challenging the tradition of cohesion and unity that has long been a hallmark of the military. For many aspiring to a lifetime in uniform, a brief four-year term may lack the appeal and security associated with a permanent military career. Addressing these issues, including potentially raising the retention rate, could enhance the scheme’s appeal and better align it with the values of loyalty and stability that inspire many to serve. With thoughtful revisions, the Agnipath Scheme could more fully achieve its vision, strengthening not only the armed forces but also the enduring spirit of service among India’s youth.
Author’s Bio:
Anushka S is a second-year student at Jindal School of International Affairs, pursuing her Bachelor’s in Political Science (Hons.). Her research interests include the intersection of religious studies and political theory, public policy, social welfare, and developmental growth.
NICKELED AND DIMED 